Travesty of justice is all one can say. A well run state is rundown by
vicious vendetta. If murder trials at supreme court can be heard for final plea
for a person facing death or life in thirty minutes, then surely when the fate
of millions of people of the state also acutely depends on quicker and just
dispensing of justice.
I have dared to highlight the other side!
People see everything in pure
black and white only. Anything apparently against corrupt politicians is right!
Unfortunately the Judges too does not dare to give benefit of doubt when the
person is a politician accused of corruption now-a-days.
The point is that last 18 years nothing was happening in this case and
suddenly on day of retirement a judge pronounces a judgement like this and that
is why the question of travesty of justice.
Murder trials can hang for decades
in court, but when it comes for plea and hearing at SC, it now just gets 30
minutes for ruling Chief Minister of a State!!!
There has to be balance.
I am in favour of justice and not politics
of vendetta. If justice was just, then Tata would not have got his restrained
orders in Radia Tape cases in less than few hours in Supreme Court where common
man can even die waiting for justice.
If that was the case, then all
politicians who are occupying parliament should be heard and stand justice in
30 minutes & why not?
I just gave you 2 examples. She is not the only one
guilty and the entire system is corrupt, look at Manu Singhvi case now? These
are the guys who cry foul for black money and mock the justice system.
The
question is not of taking any side, for or against.
That is not the point.
What is worrisome for last few years in India is the sensationalism in
the justice system. The jurisprudence premises cannot be left to
interpretations at the fancy of a judge, but on the crystallised precept of
principles enshrined in the legal system and constitution.
No one should be
above law, but the homogeneity of its application when drifted, makes it
biased. A just system of justice is the first pillar of democracy, which now is
either getting questioned or is becoming weak due to vigilante and activism.
This needs scrutiny. And a justice and legal system cannot be a cloistered virtue
and must have the sagacity and capacity to address the public opinion and
censures & scrutiny, if necessary.
Justice is about hopes of people to feel
secure in a democracy that their rights would not be trampled by high and
mighty, but would be able to stand on equal footing. Do we have the same
feeling today for the system?
We must remember that regional pride is more crucial and an anchor in a
federal system, which mustn't be smothered by force.
Tamil Nadu was, as of now, is
amongst the better run state where common people saw a lot of hope from current
incumbency, which was hurt and therefore, the problem.
Jaya was also out of power for 8 years, where was the justice then? They
could have prosecuted her then and no one would have groused.
But now a well
run state, people have other views on the state benefits, which is fine, but to
put the entire administration in disarray at a stroke of a pen after 18 years
hurts.
Imagine the Godhra cases being standing retrials today and Modi is convicted
today, what will happen to India? Utter chaos, but it will survive. Similar is
the case of TN, it will survive but chaos would prevail. Judgement needs to
have a holistic view and not a populist outlook of sensationalism to get
famous. Even CJ's have resorted to such antics; 2G & Coalgate are classic
example where a Judge on his retirement day or just before that pronounces a judgement.
Let us not forget that in democracy all are always not equal, if it was
so then why provide immunity to PM & President only during their tenure and
why not to CM’s in a federal system?
And that is the Point.
On top a corrupt bureaucracy & officials helps the motive.
The planners like Kaushik Basu & Montek Singh, including the loathsome & mummified Prime Minister are offshoot of western value education having no mooring to the Indian ground realities, except in theories.
It is too late for them to grip with it. They are just theoreticians and lack sensibilities to govern in an impoverished environment where almost 40% of the workforce is on subsistence level (statistics are big lies in India) where at least 70% of people do not have access to safe potable water and almost similar people having no access to sanitation of a safe toilet.
The educational standards are so disparate that India produce largest number of professionals & yet more than 70% of them face employability issues & therefore not a single university has ever been able to produce a single noble laureate from it.
The infrastructures are frayed to the point of crumbling & yet new roads, dams, power generation units etc are being sanctioned recklessly without having the back-ends in place, e.g. power plants without a secure coal or gas supply, highways half done due to no land acquisition and compensation policies.
I can go on endlessly & incumbent dispensation will not be pleased.
So wherein lies the solution?
The woes of India actually doesn't lie in its micro or macro economic problem, but in serious political reforms & that must begin by new constitution, change in governance structures, autonomy to states & investment in quality education and R&D.
But Indians also needs to have a serious change of attitude quickly. The attitude today is fatalistic and submissive due to its socio political history of oppression for last 2,000 years & that got worse post independence with equal voting right thereby cleverly eliminating the educated class to have its say, especially when more than 60% of the India is illiterate, especially in northern heartland & that suits the number democracy.
Corruption, which is rampant, is simply out of social desperation and disparity, again stemming out of the loopholes and fatality of the people, both the givers & the takers.
The economic jargons of inflation, stagflation, slow down, devaluation, consumption, growth, subsidy etc. is not going to help India. But a genuine intent to do fundamental change in governance structures & educational qualities would bring about the entire necessary social changes that would be eventually the engine of sustained growth.
In the meantime people like, Basu & Singh’s would continue like a sucker who think that Indian can live well for 50 US cents today in urban India & yet they can have the audacity to bill the government a sum of almost 4,000 US$ per day for travel expenses!!!
All this is possible in a shabby democracy riding on the back of poor Indians who is just struggling for his next meal & is fatality comes to the fore then either by hook or by crook, which manifests to the western world as corruption.
Time would tell & so would The People.